<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>THING2THING &#187; Australian Academy of Law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thing2thing.com/?feed=rss2&#038;tag=australian-academy-of-law" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thing2thing.com</link>
	<description>A History of Wikileaks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2026 04:33:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Jennifer Robinson &#8211; The Wikileaks Experience</title>
		<link>http://thing2thing.com/?p=1778</link>
		<comments>http://thing2thing.com/?p=1778#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 17:50:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CaTⓋ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ACADEMIC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LIVING PROOF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australian Academy of Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jennifer Robinson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julian Assange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Macquarie University]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rule of Law Inst. Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wikileaks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thing2thing.com/?p=1778</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["The Wikileaks saga raises these questions. At one level it is self-evident that publication of a treasure trove of hitherto secret documents can only boost governmental accountability and transparency. On any view, there is an overwhelming public interest in revealing human rights abuses by governments, whether with claims to be democratic or not. Similarly, there is an overwhelming public interest in disclosing the true basis for major political decisions, particularly those involving armed conflict. It is also true that the dangers of releasing hitherto secret information have been much exaggerated – the grave consequences feared by many governmental agencies have generally not come to pass and certainly there can be no excuse for intimidatory extra-legal tactics directed at the publishers of leaked material and at or those who represent them."              The Hon Acting Justice, Ronald Sackville <a class="more-link" href="http://thing2thing.com/?p=1778">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><iframe src="http://player.vimeo.com/video/32513664?title=0&amp;byline=0&amp;portrait=0" width="640" height="360" frameborder="0" webkitAllowFullScreen mozallowfullscreen allowFullScreen></iframe>
<p><a href="http://vimeo.com/32513664"><strong><span style="color: #f10000;">Jennifer Robinson &#8211; The Wikileaks Experience</a> <span style="color: #f10000;">from <a href="http://vimeo.com/user8412228"></span></strong><strong><span style="color: #f10000;">CaTV</a> </span></strong><strong><span style="color: #f10000;">on </span></strong><strong><span style="color: #f10000;"><a href="http://vimeo.com"><span style="color: #f10000;">Vimeo</a>.</span></strong></p>
<p><strong>Sydney, 18/11/11</strong> &#8211; Invited by the AAL (Australian Academy of Law), the RULE OF LAW Institute of Australia and Macquarie Law School, Jennifer Robinson delivers the keynote address at the inaugural conference of the Centre for Legal Governance. The theme for the day: <strong><span style="color: #f10000;">&#8220;Tomorrow&#8217;s Law: Disclosure of Information &#8211; Balancing Public and Private Interests&#8221;. </span></strong></p>
<p>The conference addressed issues which are of on-going concern for the state of our democracy and the rule of law, and include whistle-blowing, censorship and classification, and journalism and the public interest.</p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #999999;">&#8220;Jennifer Robinson, Julian Assange’s lawyer, gave us a passionate keynote address, telling us about the trials and tribulations (literally) of Wikileaks and of the only person I have heard of who is the subject of an unauthorised autobiography&#8230;</span></strong><br />
<a href="http://thing2thing.com/wp-content/uploads/JR-paper.png"><img src="http://thing2thing.com/wp-content/uploads/JR-paper.png" alt="Jennifer Robinson - The Wikileaks Experience" title="Jennifer Robinson - The Wikileaks Experience" width="1020" height="576" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1789" /></a></p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #999999;">The Wikileaks saga raises these questions. At one level it is self-evident that publication of a treasure trove of hitherto secret documents can only boost governmental accountability and transparency. On any view, there is an overwhelming public interest in revealing human rights abuses by governments, whether with claims to be democratic or not. Similarly, there is an overwhelming public interest in disclosing the true basis for major political decisions, particularly those involving armed conflict. It is also true that the dangers of releasing hitherto secret information have been much exaggerated – the grave consequences feared by many governmental agencies have generally not come to pass and certainly </span></strong><strong><span style="color: #f10000;">there can be no excuse for intimidatory extra-legal tactics directed at the publishers of leaked material and at or those who represent them.&#8221;</span></strong></p>
<p>The Hon Acting Justice, Ronald Sackville</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thing2thing.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=1778</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
